Last verified: 20 August 2026
Medical disclaimer
Get Peptide Reviews publishes consumer research about how peptides are regulated, marketed and priced. It is not medical advice. We are not physicians, pharmacists or your care team, and nothing on this site establishes a clinician-patient relationship.
Do not use anything here to start, stop or change a treatment. If you are currently taking a compounded peptide and something you read here concerns you, the right next step is a conversation with the clinician who prescribed it — not stopping on your own.
Sourcing standard
Every factual claim carries a link to its source, inline, at the point the claim is made. Regulatory claims cite the eCFR, the Federal Register or FDA.gov. Clinical claims cite the study, with a PMID where one exists. Company claims cite the company's own page, with the date we read it.
We do not cite peptide vendors, compounding pharmacies or telehealth companies as authorities on law, safety or efficacy. We cite them as evidence of what they say.
How we handle uncertainty
Three rules, and they are the ones we are most serious about.
Where sources conflict, we report the conflict. FDA's own documents are internally inconsistent on at least one substance we cover. The useful thing to do with that is show you both documents and explain which reading we find more persuasive and why — not to pick one and present it as settled.
Where we could not verify something, we say we could not verify it, and we say what we tried. Several important facts in this area are documented only in specialist trade press because FDA published no Federal Register notice. We label those as trade-press-sourced rather than presenting them as FDA-sourced.
Where we are inferring rather than reporting, we label it. Our assessment is not the same thing as an agency's position, and we do not let the two blur together.
What we assert and what we attribute
We draw a hard line between two kinds of statement, and we handle them differently on every page.
We assert what governments and peer-reviewed journals publish. Regulatory status, FDA advisory votes, Federal Register notices, published studies, anti-doping status. These appear in our own voice, without hedging, because every one of them links to a document you can open and read. This is the safest material on the site, not the riskiest, and we do not soften it.
We attribute what companies publish about themselves. Prices, plan terms, what is included, clinician involvement, pharmacy relationships, states served, certifications, refund and cancellation policies. These appear as "the company states on its pricing page that...", with a link and the date we read it. We do not restate a company's claim as though it were our finding, and we do not vouch for it.
For anything specific to your situation, we hand you off. What you personally will be charged, whether you are eligible, whether they ship to your state this month, how a refund would work in your case — only the company can answer those, and their answer is the one that binds. Every company section on this site ends by telling you to ask them.
We do not rank or recommend
We publish no scores, no rankings, no tiers and no picks. Every company we cover is presented in an identical template so that nothing about the shape of a page flatters one company over another.
Where we could not verify something, we say so and say what we checked. That is a statement about the limits of our research, not a verdict on the company. Readers can run the same checks, and we explain how in how we review.
Claims about efficacy
For any substance without competent and reliable human evidence, our language is descriptive rather than evaluative. We write that something is "marketed for tendon repair," not that it "helps repair tendons." This is the FTC substantiation standard and it is also just accurate: for most of the peptides sold in this market, nobody knows whether they work.
Attribution does not change this. Under the FTC endorsement rules a publisher is responsible for the claims it republishes, and quoting a company does not transfer that responsibility to the company. So we do not carry a seller's claim about what a peptide does, even in quotation marks, unless the regulatory and evidence context sits in the same paragraph. In most cases we simply do not carry it: we report what a company sells, not what it says the product will do for you.
Safety lines we do not cross
- No dosing, reconstitution, or administration guidance for anything that is not an FDA-approved drug — in any format, including tables and "for reference" asides.
- No links to grey-market "research use only" vendors, in any context.
- No sourcing guidance for unapproved substances.
- No fabricated authors, credentials, medical reviewers or author photographs.
Authorship
Articles are written by the Get Peptide Reviews editorial team. We are consumer researchers, not clinicians, and we say so on every page rather than implying medical authority we do not have.
We have not engaged a clinical reviewer. When we do, we will name them, publish their credentials, and show which articles they reviewed and on what date. We would rather tell you we don't have one than invent one — several sites in this category display "medical expert" rosters we were unable to verify against any licensing board, and we are not going to join them.
Corrections
Email corrections@getpeptidereviews.com. We check every correction against the primary source.
Where we were wrong, we fix the page and add a dated correction note explaining what changed. We do not silently edit factual errors out of published pages. Where a page has been substantively updated rather than corrected, the "last verified" date changes and significant updates are noted.
Companies we cover are welcome to use the same address, and we will treat a documented correction from a company the same way we treat one from a reader: we check it, and if it holds, we publish it.
Independence
No company pays for inclusion, ranking, or favourable coverage. Companies do not see articles before publication. Affiliate relationships are disclosed in full on our disclosure page and labelled inline everywhere they appear.
Update cadence
Regulatory pages are re-verified monthly and immediately on any FDA action. Pricing pages are re-verified monthly. The verification date sits at the top of every page.